Logotype The Swedish NAO

Municipal reporting of costs needs to be adapted to new demands for reliability

If Sweden’s municipalities used common policies to account for costs, comparisons between municipalities with different organisations would be facilitated. In addition, the risk of manipulation of the equalisation system for costs associated with the Act concerning Support and Service for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments (LSS) would be reduced, shows the Swedish National Audit Office audit.

Person arbetar vid dator med att fylla i räkenskapssammandraget.

Audit background

Every year, every Swedish municipality downloads a large Excel form from Statistics Sweden’s (SCB) website. This data is called the Annual Municipal Accounts (RS) and constitutes the State’s most important source of information about the financial situation and development of the municipalities.

The role of RS has gradually evolved from mainly forming a basis for the national accounts and related product, to also providing the financial components of key figures for municipal comparisons. If the data is to serve this purpose, the policies for reporting to RS must be fair even if the municipalities are differently organised. Accounting for common costs may constitute a considerable source of error when comparing municipalities.

The purpose of the audit is to investigate whether central government has created the conditions for municipalities to account for overheads so that RS forms a reliable basis for comparison of municipalities.

Press contact: Olle Castelius, phone: +46 8-5171 40 04.

Presskontakt: , telefon: 08-5171 42 06.


Updated: 15 August 2018

Contact form

Send your questions or comments via the form below and we will make sure that they reach the right member of staff. Please state if your question concerns the information on this particular page.

What is your question about?
What is your question about?