The introduction of investment savings accounts has made it easy to save and invest in shares. However, the audit of the Swedish National Audit Office reveals that these accounts may have cost the central government SEK 42 billion in forgone tax revenue.
The investment savings account (ISK) was introduced in 2012 to make it easier for individuals to save and invest in financial instruments such as shares and fund units. These accounts have become very popular and has encouraged more than 2.2 million people to open such accounts.
The Swedish NAO’s audit indicates that investment savings accounts have simplified saving and investing in shares in a number of ways, for example, by making it easier to file tax returns. Saving in funds, however, has not been simplified to the same extent since prior to the reform, it was already easy to declare gains and losses on fund units.
On the other hand, certain aspects of saving in shares have become more complicated. This includes participation in certain new share issues and initial public offerings, as well as companies distributing shares in a subsidiary.
Furthermore, the introduction of the investment savings account has meant that there are now two parallel systems for the taxation of directly-owned financial instruments. Savers who wish to avoid paying more tax than necessary must evaluate whether or not an investment savings account is favourable from a tax perspective.
The introduction of the investment savings account has resulted in a more complex tax system. The difficulties that this can entail for the individual saver should not be underestimated, says Auditor General Ingvar Mattson.
The tax on savings in an investment savings account is paid regardless of whether the assets increase or decrease in value. This makes it riskier to save in an investment savings account than in a conventional scheme, where tax is paid on dividends and gains, and deductions are made for losses.
Considering the fact that saving in an investment savings account entails more risk, such an account cannot be deemed to be a particularly favourable in terms of taxation, says Anna Brink, project manager for the audit.
In retrospect, it can be noted that the return on investments in shares have been minimally taxed on investment savings accounts during the years 2012–2017. The Swedish NAO has calculated an estimated forgone tax revenue due to the reform. The calculations suggest forgone tax revenue of SEK 23 billion during the period. In addition, capital gains generated during the period, but not realised before 2018, will result in further forgone tax revenue of SEK 19 billion in the future.
In total, we may be seeing forgone tax revenue of SEK 42 billion since 2012. These large amounts are explained by the strong performance of the stock market. If the stock market had not performed as well, the results would be different, says Auditor General Ingvar Mattson.
The Swedish NAO recommends the Government to regularly inform the Riksdag of the impact that investment savings accounts have on tax revenue.
Furthermore, the Government should review the possibilities of simplifying share savings in investment savings accounts in terms of participation in new share issues and initial public offerings, as well as in holdings of shares in subsidiaries that are distributed.
In the event of a tax reform, the following is also recommended:
Press contact: Olle Castelius, phone: +46 8-5171 40 04.
Presskontakt: Olle Castelius , telefon: 08-5171 42 06.
Send your questions or comments via the form below and we will make sure that they reach the right member of staff. Please state if your question concerns the information on this particular page.